Film, TV

Infinity War and the Marvel ‘lack of consequence’ problem

So you’ve seen Infinity War, right?

First of… *clears throat* ‘Holy fucking shit, that ending! Geez, did you just see that…Jesus!’

Right, now I’ve got that out of my system, let’s move on. Oh, and if you haven’t already seen the movie, stop reading and come back later. Unlike the Marvel universe, you can’t use a Time Stone to undo the consequences (burn!) of reading and frankly the film deserves to be experienced first-hand.

Still with me? Well, good, because Infinity War was pretty fun, right? An admirable smashing together of a whole bunch of Marvel properties that by-and-large works very well, assuming you know your Peter Quill from your Peter Parker.

But given that ending, and the various deaths racked up along the way, I want to ask a question. Does Infinity War solve the Marvel ‘lack of consequences’ problem?


Accusation: In most Marvel movies, there are very little consequences

The Marvel Cinematic Universe movies are so much fun. They’re dependable slices of blockbuster entertainment and even if you don’t love one of the movies, you’ll still probably have a good time with it nonetheless.

This makes it all the more frustrating that the MCU tends to have very little actual consequences. By that I don’t mean exclusively characters dying, although that is certainly part of it (oh, and ‘dead but not really’ fake-outs are the worst – Loki, Nick Fury etc.) No, stories can have huge consequences without it necessarily involving the death of a character. In fact, I would go so far as to argue Game of Thrones has literally used up all its ‘story progression by death’ and has come up unstuck in delivering storytelling not dependent on shock-death.

But the clincher is, the MCU very rarely has any form of consequence. Certainly there are some good character journeys over the course of the films (Tony and Steve effectively switching ideologies being one of them) and some of the solo films are exceptions (Guardians 2, in particular, lands a fantastic character death) but, largely, stakes feel huge but mean nothing.

Let’s go through a few examples. In The Winter Soldier, it turns out that SHIELD has actually been infiltrated by Hydra, an extreme Nazi cult. Doesn’t really matter in the grand scheme of things. Ultron ends with a whole country being destroyed partially as a result of the Avenger’s actions, and it’s not really mentioned at the end of the movie. Civil War wants us to believe character relationships are damaged, but backtracks with Steve’s letter to Tony straight away.

None of it matters. Now, on occasion, stuff gets weight retroactively in a latter film – for example, the destruction of Sokovia has a huge impact on Civil War – but that’s not quite the same (more on this latter.) Most movies can’t rely on a sequel to give them meaning, and pretty much all good movies have immediate tangible consequences. That’s what gives them purpose.

So, the question is, in light of Infinity War, has this problem been solved?…

The answer is no, by the way, absolutely not. It actually makes things worse.


Is Infinity War the most inconsequential Marvel movie?

After a decade of being terrified to kill characters, Infinity War goes nuclear, killing Loki, Heimdall, Gamora, Vision and then a huge chunk of the other Avengers in one go.

Shit, boy! It’s like Marvel’s Red Wedding…apart from we know a whole load of it won’t stick. Spiderman, Guardians and Black Panther all have movies coming up so they aren’t gone for good. Straight away that undermines the ending. The funeral music credits, so powerful at the time, can’t help but feel like a gimmicky, weightless bit of audience manipulation rather than earned as a result of, you know, actually telling a good story.

The film has stones that can alter reality and reverse time. All the while those stones are around, nothing sticks, even if the film genuinely is committing. Are Loki and Gamora actually gone for good? If so, brave decision, I guess. But the film is crying wolf at the end, and so those deaths feel as temporary as every other.

There’s even a version of events whereby this could become the most inconsequential and pointless Marvel movie yet if it turns out they can rewrite time completely. If all the events of this film are undone then what on earth was the point?

Don’t get me wrong, I think the next movie will require sacrifice (Tony Stark basically has a target on his head the whole time now), but they can’t keep relying on subsequent movies to prop up the significance of the last. It’s bad storytelling.

And here’s the thing. Impossible, unbelievable stakes don’t need to be this empty and, to demonstrate my point, I want to compare Infinity War to an episode of the single greatest television show ever made – Doctor Who.


Infinity War and The Doctor

Although the most obvious episode to compare to Infinity War would be ‘The Stolen Earth’ (both stories involve aliens attacking, various different properties coming together and both have to juggle a huge amount of characters) I actually want to compare it to a slightly weirder episode, ‘The Pandorica Opens.’

If Infinity War thinks its stakes are high, ‘The Pandorica Opens’ is like ‘bitch, please. You killed half of all life in the universe? Well we’ve literally exploded every star and the universe itself has faded out of existence. Those are REAL stakes.’ Yes, seriously, the penultimate episode of Series 5 ends with the whole universe blowing up. Go big or go home, I guess!

So, presumably, this should exhibit all the same problems as Infinity War. The universe can’t stay blown up for obvious reasons, it’s going to have to be undone. But, far from feeling pointless, ‘The Pandorica Opens’ is a sublime bit of storytelling even before its excellent finale solves everything in a witty and cerebral way.


Because ‘The Pandorica Opens’ is about a lot more than the fate of the universe. There are important character moments between the Doctor and his companion, and between the companion and her husband that she forgot existed (who is also now a Roman Centurion, and also an evil plastic alien who doesn’t realise it…God damn, I love Doctor Who.)

It hinges on a fascinating question – ‘What monster is so feared in all the universe that it needs to be locked in the Pandorica?’ The answer turns out to be *spoilers* The Doctor. This isn’t just clever and shocking, it’s an insight into the theme of Matt Smith’s tenure – how The Doctor himself, with the best intentions in the world, can be seen by others as a monster and destructive force. Fear of him literally threatens the entire universe.

The episode ends with The Doctor imprisoned, the companion dead, the TARDIS blowing up and the universe ceasing to exist. Even though every single one of these is undone in the next episode, it’s actually about something greater than the obvious stakes – you can’t undo the character development or thematic exploration.

But if I asked you what is Infinity Wars about, I think you’d struggle to answer beyond ‘a purple alien wants to destroy half of everything’. There isn’t time for character development between the main heroes, so it’s a pretty surface level watch. The character explored the most is probably Thanos, and the biggest take away from him is maybe ‘crazy bad people sometimes think they’re justified’…but it’s all very flimsy. It’s relying on the shock factor of its deaths and stakes in a way the aforementioned Doctor Who episode just isn’t.

And the funny thing is, Doctor Who IS a TV series, ‘The Pandorica Opens’ IS a penultimate episode. This form of ‘all is lost’ storytelling is suited for television where you can find out the resolution next week. It sits uncomfortably in a movie that won’t get a follow-up for a year. (Although if Avengers 4 turns out to be a small, character driven piece exploring zany ideas on how to save the universe in the way ‘The Big Bang’ follows up ‘The Pandorica Opens’, all will be forgiven. Just saying.)


There are now less consequences

There’s still no evidence Marvel has learned its lesson when it comes to consequences and frankly, that’s becoming increasingly frustrating. God damn it guys, just commit already! If stones can literally alter reality, things feel less at stake than ever.

But if this piece has been overly grumpy, I want to emphasise I had a great time with Infinity War. It’s great, stupid, magnificent fun and a cinematic experiment that we just haven’t seen before. And oh boy has it got us talking and speculating. I’ll be there on opening night for Part 2, so I guess it kind of did its job.

It’s just the lack of consequences that I think the Marvel movies really need to overcome. Without consequence there can be no meaning, and the whole point of stories, even dumb fun ones, is to leave the audience with something beyond pure plot.

Film, Politics

Okay, let’s talk about Black Panther…

As insidious as it is that Disney seem to be buying pretty much everything at the moment, it’s hard to argue with the quality of their recent output. Thor Ragnarok was an offbeat comedy that tackled colonialism head-on, The Last Jedi was one of the deepest blockbusters in recent memory (easily the best Star Wars film since Empire), and now we have Black Panther.

Anyone who thought that Black Panther was going to be breezy and turn a blind eye to its cultural relevance just because it was part of the MCU were in for a shock – Black Panther is an incredibly political film. Wakanda is a kingdom unaffected by colonialism, T’Challa is a king who struggles with both his own and the kingdom’s conservative views on isolationism, and Killmonger, the movie’s antagonist, wants to use their advanced weaponry to liberate people against systemic oppression.

I’ve seen Black Panther twice now and it’s clear this is a movie begging to be dissected and discussed for years to come. And yes, I know what you’re all thinking, ‘Yay, the hot take we’ve been waiting for – what does the white guy think?’

Fear not, I don’t plan to spend long giving my ‘verdict’ on the film. In short, I really like it but I don’t quite love it. I love the characters (Shuri is now my favourite MCU character), I love the soundtrack and I love the sheer weight of its political themes, but there were one or two plot points which clunked for me.

But you know what, that really doesn’t matter because I’m not the film’s primary audience. By that I don’t mean I can’t enjoy it – as I say, I really did – I just mean that the most visceral reactions are going to be from the people seeing themselves represented in a way they haven’t before. As a white geek, the last decade or so of blockbuster cinema has been almost entirely aimed at me. That’s starting to change. Slowly. And I can’t wait.

With a different primary audience we get different stories, different beats and different issues to explore. From a purely selfish point of view, that’s surely more interesting than watching the same western white male experience play out in every single form it possibly can.

It’ll raise questions, and that’s great. It’ll challenge the fundamentally flawed idea that the default character is a white guy, and it’ll challenge the image that the default setting is Western (or else be deemed ‘tokenistic’.)

Black Panther gives those of us who are white the chance to engage with art in a deeper way than logical nit-picks, Cinema Sins-style bullshit, and arbitrary star ratings – for once we can just shut up and listen.

For many black viewers, it’s clear that Black Panther means something very special. Representation matters and everyone deserves to feel empowered by what they see on screen. Black Panther is crushing it at the box office because people have wanted this shit for so long, and to read the writing of both black critics and general black moviegoers permits us an insight into the responses of those who this film is truly for.

It’s also important to remember that the black response to this is not homogeneous, people have reacted in different ways. After all, no white film maker has ever had to carry the burden of capturing all differing white perspectives so we shouldn’t expect the same from Ryan Coogler.

For example, Christopher Lebron, Associate Professor at John Hopkins university, has described the film’s central arguments as racist.

He warned on Twitter that ‘black folks should always be a little suspicious when white #liberalmedia crowns a work of black art as revolutionary, because that usually means they think all the work has been accomplished by the art and their part is over, when it’s just supposed to be starting.’

Can a film with a predominantly black cast, made by a black director, be racist? I guess if you see it only as an extension of the Disney machine then yes, even if you’d have to cynically see Ryan Coogler as selling out or ungenerously presume he’s too stupid to see what he’s doing. Yet there’s undeniably something instinctively gross about a white CIA agent shooting down the tools of liberation for the oppressed as the film’s victory moment – especially if divorced from the larger context of the movie.

Whilst I certainly prefer Film Crit Hulk’s interpretation that the movie is much more of a dialogue than that, and actually about the duality of the black experience, it’s important to recognise the many reactions to this movie in the black community (whilst acknowledging, of course, that it is overwhelmingly positive).

I also found Stephen Bush’s article in the New Stateman to be a really interesting perspective. He’s much more interested in seeing a black hero who is incidentally black than a hero who is defined by it, but he goes on to concede ‘for a young child whose blackness is more important to them than mine was to me, Black Panther will be a seminal moment not because of what it might portend, but because of what it is.’

There are plenty of issues to be worked through, and it’s almost a relief that the white perspective on them is irrelevant. It’s the perfect antidote to today’s ‘everyone has to have an opinion on EVERYTHING’ mentality – not because we should be passive zombies, but because we need to recognise people have unique worldviews, experiences and backgrounds which make their opinions on certain topics better informed and more vital.

I think Black Panther as a movie is itself a dialogue and has gone on to create a healthy discussion. It’s on us to learn from what is being shared.

To be clear, it’s important to point out I do not mean to appropriate a cultural landmark and make it about what white people can learn from it. The representation provided and debates about said representation in the black community are absolutely the fundamental good from Black Panther. Only as a secondary good, from the periphery, do we talk about what we can learn from this.

So let’s hear differing perspectives with empathy so we can begin to understand experiences beyond our own. There are so many good pieces on this movie out there – go and read them! Yes, let’s talk about Black Panther, but let’s also listen.

That’s part of what makes Black Panther so awesome. That’s why it’s incredible a film like this has been released as a tentpole movie. Wakanda forever!


Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol. 2 – the best MCU movie so far? (spoiler free)

I’m not ashamed to say I, along with many others, wept at the end of Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol. 2. Yep, I cried during a Marvel movie…the one about talking raccoons and baby trees no less. The general tone of a Marvel movie isn’t hard to predict, largely a lot of laughs and a little bit of ‘that’s awesome’ thrown in, but tear-jerking…I wasn’t expecting that!

Truthfully I’m not really sure what I was expecting. The first Guardians movie is my favourite of the MCU movies largely because it strays a delicate line of irreverent humour and absolute emotional sincerity perfectly, with a tonal dexterity that other Marvels tend not to have. Equipped with a killer retro soundtrack on top of that (which informs the emotion of the film as well as simply being great fun), the original flew its way straight into my heart.

The trouble is, a sequel to a movie that was essentially lightening in a bottle was always going to be difficult. On the one hand, if the sequel simply doubles down on the elements that work well in the original it’ll almost always be met with the accusation of diminishing returns. On the other, doing something completely different might risk losing the charm of the original and alienating the existing fanbase.

James Gunn, however, finds a steady compromise between the two approaches. Vol. 2 certainly does bring back everything people loved from the original (namely the humour, tone and retro soundtrack) bigger and better than ever before. As Baby Groot dances around to ELO’s ‘Mr Blue Sky’ during the opening as the Guardians fight a big tentacled monster, it’s pretty clear we’re in familiar territory (and, quite possibly, operates as a simple metaphor for the film’s focus throughout.)

Yet Vol. 2 does offer new experiences as well. This time around the team are broken up into smaller groups to pursue their own individual stories, which gives everything a slightly different flavour. It’s also a deeper and more personal movie than the first, with clearer and more thoroughly explored themes. It’s not quite The Empire Strikes Back or The Godfather Part II of sequels, but it’s certainly not a simple re-tread either.

It’s helped by different characters taking centre stage. Certainly Peter Quill is still the main character and it’s ultimately his story, but it does feel even more of an ensemble piece this time. Yondu, in particular, is given a lot more to do than in the first movie and I imagine he may well end up being many people’s favourite Guardian after this. New character Mantis is also an adorable addition to the team, forming a genuinely moving relationship with Drax – despite being the complete opposite in many ways.

Speaking of adorable, Baby Groot is insanely fucking cute. He really does steal the movie and just a tiny change in his expression can (and will) break your heart. As Guardians Of The Galaxy does best, Baby Groot isn’t just an opportunity for laughs (and merchandise), but actually works really well with the film’s focus on family and parenting.

The plot could be accused of being a little on the slight side. In fact it’s very much like an early series Star Trek story played out over two hours, but to say much more would be to enter into spoiler territory. I do think this gives us one of Marvel’s better villains, which is admittedly faint praise. It’s not quite Loki standard, but it’s a bit better than a lot of the other disposable villains Marvel has gotten through (Malekith, Ronan, Whiplash etc. )

There’s also mercifully little connection to the MCU at large, in fact I think this might be the most standalone Marvel movie yet. Whereas even the first Guardians movie was burdened with The Collector and explaining the infinity stones, Vol. 2 is given free-reign to tell the story it desires free of interference. Even the five (yes, five!) post-credit sequences don’t really inform on the MCU at large. Ironically, however, the little we do learn of Thanos (the MCU’s ‘big bad’) in a brief but powerful conversation between Gamora and Nebula actually does more to build him up as a horrific villain than all the hints and appearances of Thanos in the entire MCU to date. But this mention isn’t forced, it’s entirely organic to the story and very much important to the theme of family that Vol. 2 orbits.

The film also looks gorgeous. It’s an explosion of vibrant colours, psychedelic and vivid. For those who sometimes think Marvel movies look a bit bland (I mean I enjoyed Civil War, but did it have to be SO grey?!), then Vol. 2’s delightfully garish colour palette will be welcome (and it looks like we’ll be getting more of this beauty in the third Thor outing!)

Vol. 2 certainly isn’t perfect. By breaking up the team and focusing on the individual storylines it loses some of that leanness and simplicity which gave the first outing such a wonderful source of momentum. Equally, a cynical viewer might say some of the scenes exist to serve the soundtrack, rather than the other way around (parts come close to feeling like a music video). I also think a little more could be done with the sci-fi action aesthetic. I know the movie always has its tongue firmly in cheek (there’s an alien race who fly spaceships as if they’re arcade machines) and that’s all part of the fun, but I did sometimes wish for a little more weight to the space battles just so the action set-pieces don’t feel so disposable.

But the reason this isn’t a deal-breaker is no-matter how weightless the action may seem, James Gunn realises this and always keeps the characters front and centre – their journeys are what give weight throughout. And I really have to applaud this movie for ending in such an emotional and kind of downbeat way (yes, back to the weeping). When you think about it, nearly every MCU movie (with very few exceptions) ends in a way which could be summed up as ‘the hero’s ready to kick ass in the next movie’. That isn’t the case in Vol. 2, which instead ends on a moment of entirely earned emotional poignancy.

It’ll be interesting to see what the status of Marvel movies will be once the MCU reaches its inevitable end. Whilst most of the movies are good (some, indeed, are excellent), they are a bizarre blend of film and product, the likes of which cinema hadn’t really seen before. Marvel movies can virtually act as advertisements for future installments (Iron Man 2 and Age of Ultron being notable culprits for this.) When there is no future, so to speak, will these films stand up as something that can be watched at any time (something I’d feel comfortable replying positively for in the case of The Dark Knight and the first two Raimi Spider-Man movies) or are they so of the moment that they will eventually fade into obscurity, like filler episodes of a TV show?

It’s hard to say, but I do believe that if any of the series are going to standout then it’s going to be the Guardians movies (based on the first two, at least.) They transcend the MCU in many ways, and operate on a total different level of quality. Largely free from the shackles of being an advertisement or having to reference events of earlier movies, they are able to be their own thing and do genuinely feel like the work of a visionary director as opposed to a studio committee. The ending of Vol. 2 really reaffirms my faith that this series has the maturity and freedom to tell its story with absolute integrity to the plot and characters, rather than service a franchise.

The next time we see the Guardians it will be in the eagerly anticipated Infinity Wars, teaming up with the Avengers. Whilst it’ll certainly be a treat to see them there, it doesn’t feel necessary – if the Guardians never crossed-over it wouldn’t matter a bit and that’s why these movies work so well, the continuity connection is an added bonus, not a pivotal part of their appeal.

With James Gunn having just confirmed he’s signed up for Vol. 3, we know these wacky bunch of space misfits are in good hands. I, for one, can’t wait to see what they get up to next.

Deadpool movie review

Deadpool review – I think I preferred it when his mouth was sewn shut

As much as I love superhero movies, there’s no denying that one of their biggest flaws is they’re usually very studio driven. They are movies that often feel very safe because they have to make big money and shift merchandise, so narrative risks aren’t a staple of the genre.

Deadpool does not have this problem. It feels very much like a labour of love by all those involved and there’s a real sense that the studio is taking a punt on a far riskier project than your standard hero flick.

This makes it all the more frustrating that I really didn’t care for the movie – I didn’t hate it, but I found its infantile and smug disposition very hard to warm to.

Don’t get me wrong, if you’re a ten year old boy who manages to sneak into a showing, you’re going to love it! There’s violence, swearing, dick jokes…even boobies!

And I feel largely alone in my apathy because it has seemingly gone down very well with critics and cinema goers alike. Sure, claims that it’s the ‘funniest’ superhero movie could be put down to release hype, but there’s a real sense that the movie has resonated with a large audience and the box office takings are set to be huge.

It’s partly understandable, not least because Ryan Reynolds feels like he was born to play Deadpool/Wade Wilson. Whatever problems I had with the movie, Reynolds’ energetic and charismatic performance is undeniably great. Despite spending a fair chunk of the movie in the tight red suit, his enthusiasm and charisma still manage to ooze through.

Equally the movie isn’t without its moments. In particular I appreciated the opening credits, set to Juice Newton’s ‘Angel Of The Morning’, which replaces actors’ names with the clichéd roles they’re playing (British Villain, Comedy Relief etc.)

But I can’t get past the fact that, at its core, Deadpool is really just an average superhero origins movie wrapped in crude dick jokes and totally in love with its own ‘edginess’.

Structurally it’s an odd one. It comes out the park all guns blazing (quite literally) with an impressive action sequence that has Deadpool cracking wise all over the place and then uses that action sequence as a framing device for flashbacks to explain the backstory.

This might have been a nice change of pace if the flashbacks weren’t so tonally jarring with what precedes them and didn’t bring everything to a screeching halt. Firstly we get to find out more about Deadpool’s love interest which I didn’t mind – despite its best intentions the film actually comes close to making their story quite touching.

But once you get to the process which turns Wade Wilson into Deadpool the film takes a turn into, frankly, almost horror and there’s seldom a laugh to be had as for ten or fifteen minutes we see Wilson sadistically tortured. It’s a moment of misplaced darkness which doesn’t fit with the film’s largely breezy tone.

That being said, even the most ‘funny’ parts of this movie were mildly amusing at best. Once you’ve heard the fifth or sixth masturbation joke it’s no-longer shocking or funny, it just feels lazy. In comparison, I recently watched Zoolander 2 and whilst I didn’t think that much of it, at least it made me genuinely laugh once or twice, Deadpool barely earned an internal chuckle.

In fact so much of the humour is predictable that you can see the punchline from miles away. Of course there was going to be an after credit sequence and of course it was going to be a meta dig at other after credit sequences. Of course when Deadpool has captured a villain and X-Man Colossus is giving a speech on the heroic virtues of mercy, Deadpool is going to shoot the villain halfway through the talk.

Everything feels a bit old-hat and outdated. Heck Guardians of the Galaxy already beat this to the punch with its ‘got ya’ after credit sequence, only it didn’t have to explicitly lay out it was punking you in the way Deadpool does.

Even the pop culture references were pretty lazy and toothless – more like average Family Guy jokes than the deconstruction of the superhero genre Deadpool had the potential to be. Deadpool really has nothing much to say about superhero movies which is in any way damning.

And the one criticism it does make is ‘aren’t superhero movies a bit earnest?’ As if Deadpool’s smug attitude, over-the-top violence, wank gags and gratuitous nudity are somehow better. I don’t know about everyone else, but give me an earnest superhero movie over this nasty, infantile nonsense any day!

It’s frustrating because we really are in the days of superhero saturation. Actors are locked into multi-deal contracts, studios are scrambling to set-up cinematic universes and movies have, in many ways, never looked more like products (and I really do say this as a fan of the genre!) There’s so much for Deadpool to satirise or get its teeth into but no, a joke about wanking off with a tiny hand is probably funnier…

And what’s all this about it being the ‘funniest’ superhero movie? As far as I’m concerned 2010’s ‘Kickass’, which was doing a very similar thing, was far funnier – in fact it was superior in just about every respect. To be honest I got more genuine laughs watching The Avengers, Iron Man 3 and Guardians of the Galaxy than watching this, and they had actual stories to tell as well.

Even The Lego Movie’s depiction of Batman was a far better playful dig at the silliness of the character than anything Deadpool can muster about superheroes – I can barely take Batman seriously with the ‘darkness, no parents’ song running through my head!

All in all Deadpool feels like an immature child’s idea of what a really great adult superhero movie would be. I can’t say it’s a bad movie because it clearly is resonating with a lot of people, it just really isn’t my cup of tea. And, frankly, I preferred it when Deadpool’s mouth was sewn shut!


Comic Book Movies Still Proving Super Popular

People can’t get enough of superhero movies.

Whether they are functioning as a cathartic exploration of difficult topics through an exaggerated reality or offering pure escapism, film goers keep paying to see them.

Three of the top ten highest grossing films of 2012 were superhero movies.

Marvel’s Avengers Assemble made $623,279,547, making it the highest grossing film of that year.

The silver screen may not be as relevant today as it once was but it is a pretty safe bet that it will be some time before superhero movies begin to feel the pinch.

Karen Phillips, General Manager of Cineworld Brighton, said: “Superhero films are huge right now. The recent success of films like Iron Man and Man of Steel has rekindled our love for comic book heroes and whetted our appetites for the latest superhero instalments.”

Every year cynics expect the novelty to wear off and await the day that these caped crusaders have outstayed their welcome but there is no sign this is happening.

In 2013 alone there were five comic book movies, all of which performed well at the box office, and, with Batman vs Superman and the build up to Avengers: Age of Ultron in 2015, there seems little chance that things are about to change.

These dysfunctional vigilantes offer an escape from the world and a break from the mundanity of everyday existence.

Ross McLaughlin, projectionist and duty manager at the Dome Cinema, Worthing said: “Whether people have grown up with comics, television series, animated cartoons or, in some cases, previous film adaptations, superheroes seem one of the few character types that can successfully transcend generations.

“The ability to travel to entire new worlds, be the best we can be, or even just stand up to a bully, superheroes tap into everyone’s dreams of what they wish they could be.”

Whilst superhero films are not a new phenomenon it has only been within the last decade that technology has been able to realise on the big screen the amazing powers and other worlds found in the comic books which offer such escapism.

Frank Verano, film studies lecturer at SussexUniversity and contributor to the new book ‘What is a Superhero?’, said: “Now contemporary superhero films execute bombastic spectacle in a way that is codified in a contemporary cinematic understanding of ‘realism’, which does not look silly, low-budget, or campy, there is a greater attraction to the material. Both technology and filmmaker sensibilities have caught up to the social demand for the material.”

Fascinatingly superhero movies do not only appeal to children but attract people from across the age demographic.

Mr Verano said: “As adults, I’m sure more of the attraction is fuelled by nostalgia and the refusal to let go of childhood.

“Weirdly this state of arrested development parallels Batman himself who was stunted emotionally by his parents’ murder and never matured into adulthood, hence the reliance of childish motifs, like costumes and weapons-as-toys.”

Escapism is not all superheroes have to offer however.

Much like the Grimms’ Fairytales they can offer an exploration of difficult topics, both for children and adults, from a safe distance.

The Dark Knight, the second highest grossing superhero film of all time, was thematically rich and tackled post-9/11 anxieties.

Further still it posed the question how far a person should go to stop a force of evil and chaos, mirroring the debate over the increasing loss of human rights justified by combating terrorism.

Exploring these difficult topics through the lens of a different world makes them easier to swallow.

Mr Verano said: “It’s certainly nothing new; “genre” fiction has been doing it for well over a century.

“I’ve read some excellent, scholarly articles on the politics of the recent batman movies – with some arguing that they are conservative and reactionary and others arguing they are politically progressive.

“Does the average spectator recognise and further engage with these topical anxieties they are confronted with in these films? That’s debatable.

“A large segment of the audience probably doesn’t want to see Batman functioning as a political symbol.

“However I would agree that these films certainly can provide an exaggerated lens with which to tackle certain topical anxieties.”

With this blend of escapism and real world issues being tackled bringing in the audiences, superhero movies are now helping win a much more down-to-earth battle; the war against piracy.

Whilst pirate copies of films are easier than ever to get hold of, superhero films are meant to be watched on the big screen.

Mr McLaughlin said: “Piracy is an issue, but spectacle of this level does bring people to the cinema for what is the only way these films should be seen.

“When Bruce Banner Hulk’s out, you want to shirk in his presence, feel the floor shake when he smashes – superheroes are not designed for the television screen.”

If that wasn’t enough, superhero films are now even helping people’s love lives.

A survey of Cineworld film goers last year found 62% of men and 77% of women rated superhero films as an ideal first date.

If audiences keep up the demand for superhero movies, there are certainly plenty of characters left to choose from.

Andrew Redhead, 23, an enthusiastic comic fan, said: “I think the truly wonderful thing about comics is that they offer an untapped wealth of characters and stories for representation on the movie screen.

“There are thousands of brilliant and popular characters who have yet to be mentioned by the film studios.”

It looks like superhero films will continue to be able to provide new worlds and praiseworthy characters for as long as the audience demands them as their source of escapism and safe but cathartic explorations of real world issues.